Skip to content

Our publications

Retrieved from Google Scholar (November 2025)

  • Rideaux, R., Dang, P., Jackel-David, L., Buhmann, Z., Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2025). Violated predictions enhance the representational fidelity of visual features in perception. Journal of Vision, 25(4), 14–14.

  • Stone, C., Mattingley, J. B., & Rangelov, D. (2025). Neural mechanisms of metacognitive improvement under speed pressure. Communications Biology, 8(1), 223.

  • Marek, N., Horr, N. K., Rangelov, D., & Pollmann, S. (2025). Prefrontal dimension change-related activation differs for visual search in sparse and dense displays. Neuropsychologia, 207, 109065.

  • Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. (2025). DR-AVXmod-02_ReproducibilityDemo.

  • Rangelov, D., Shi, E., & Mattingley, J. (2025). Neural effects of expectation violation generalize across sensory modalities.

  • Pearce, D. J., Loughnane, G. M., Chong, T. T.-J., Demeyere, N., Mattingley, J. B., Moore, M. J., New, P. W., O’Connell, R. G., O’Neill, M. H., Rangelov, D., & others. (2025). Target selection signals causally influence human perceptual decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 45(24).

  • Loneragan, S., Mattingley, J., & Rangelov, D. (2025). Posterior beliefs and behaviour of human visual information foragers.

  • Stone, C., Mattingley, J. B., Evans, N. J., & Rangelov, D. (2025). Cognitive training increases sensitivity to internal uncertainty during decision-making.

  • Rangelov, D., Fellrath, J., & Mattingley, J. B. (2024). Integrated perceptual decisions rely on parallel evidence accumulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(33).

  • Stone, C., Mattingley, J. B., Bode, S., & Rangelov, D. (2024). Distinct neural markers of evidence accumulation index metacognitive processing before and after simple visual decisions. Cerebral Cortex, 34(5).

  • Rangelov, D., Mattingley, J., & Lloyd, D. (2024). BayEst-01.

  • Li, X., Oestreich, L. K., Rangelov, D., Lévy-Bencheton, D., & O’Sullivan, M. J. (2024). Intrinsic functional networks for distinct sources of error in visual working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 34(10).

  • Gastrell, T., Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. (2024). Understanding Uncertainty in Perceptual Decision-Making: Motion Estimation Behaviour.

  • Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. (2024). Audiovisual prediction error.

  • Barnes, L., Rangelov, D., Mattingley, J. B., & Woolgar, A. (2023). Fractionating distraction: How past-and future-relevant distractors influence integrated decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(5), 737.

  • Li, X., Rangelov, D., Mattingley, J. B., Oestreich, L., Lévy-Bencheton, D., & O’Sullivan, M. J. (2023). White matter microstructure is associated with the precision of visual working memory. Neuroimage, 272, 120069.

  • Rideaux, R., West, R. K., Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2023). Distinct early and late neural mechanisms regulate feature-specific sensory adaptation in the human visual system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(6), e2216192120.

  • Vella, A., Rangelov, D., Sewell, D. K., Ballard, T., & Kritikos, A. (2023). Self-relevance Facilitates Attention to Self-associated Targets on Feature-based Selective Attention Tasks. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 45(45).

  • Stone, C., Mattingley, J., & Rangelov, D. (2023). Metacognitive training to improve perceptual decision-making.

  • Rangelov, D., Bitzer, S., & Mattingley, J. (2023). Dynamic reduction of neural uncertainty regulates perceptual decisions in a Bayes-optimal manner.

  • Pearce, D. J., Loughnane, G. M., Chong, T. T.-J., Demeyere, N., Mattingley, J. B., Moore, M. J., New, P. W., O’Connell, R. G., O’Neill, M. H., Rangelov, D., & others. (2023). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying post-stroke deficits in contralesional perceptual processing. bioRxiv, 2023–12.

  • McIntyre, M. E., Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2022). Biased weighting of temporally discrete visual stimuli in a continuous report decision-making task: A combined behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(2), 173.

  • Stone, C., Mattingley, J. B., & Rangelov, D. (2022). On second thoughts: changes of mind in decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(5), 419–431.

  • Mattingley, J., Lloyd, D., Rangelov, D., & Fellrath, J. (2022). Neural correlates of integrated decision making across space using electroencephalography.

  • Rideaux, R., West, R., Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. (2022). Talk session 15. Adaptation & Aftereffects Less accurate, but more precise, representations following adaptation to orientation revealed by forward encoding of brain activity in human observers. PERCEPTION, 51, 118–118.

  • Rangelov, D., Bitzer, S., & Mattingley, J. (2022). Talk session 14. Perception & Action II Perceptual decision making relies on reducing uncertainty about neural sensory representations. PERCEPTION, 51, 116–116.

  • Rangelov, D., West, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2021). Stimulus reliability automatically biases temporal integration of discrete perceptual targets in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(36), 7662–7674.

  • Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2020). Evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making is sensitive to the dynamics of attentional selection. NeuroImage, 220, 117093.

  • Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. (2020). Evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making is sensitive to the dynamics of attentional selection. NeuroImage, 220, Article 117093.

  • Rangelov, D., Mattingley, J. B., & West, R. (2019). Behavioral and electroencephalography recordings of human observers during a decision-making task with varying levels of task difficulty.

  • Rangelov, D., West, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2019). Stimulus reliability automatically biases temporal integration of discrete perceptual targets yielding suboptimal decisions. bioRxiv, 841353.

  • Rangelov, D., West, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2019). Stimulus reliability automatically biases temporal integration of discrete perceptual targets.

  • Szinte, M., Jonikaitis, D., Rangelov, D., & Deubel, H. (2018). Pre-saccadic remapping relies on dynamics of spatial attention. Elife, 7, e37598.

  • Uscatescu, L. C., Kronbichler, M., FitzGerald, T., & Rangelov, D. (2018). The unitary percept of object orientation is achieved through conjoint, not separate processing of horizontal and vertical axes. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 622–622.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2017). Failure to pop out: Feature singletons do not capture attention under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(5), 651.

  • Töllner, T., & Rangelov, D. (2017). Item-based selection is in good shape in visual compound search: A view from electrophysiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40.

  • Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A. M., Müller, H. J., & Rangelov, D. (2017). Saliency maps for finding changes in visual scenes? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 2190–2201.

  • Szinte, M., Rangelov, D., Jonikaitis, D., & Deubel, H. (2016). Pre-saccadic remapping is an attentional process. Journal of Vision, 16(12), 113–113.

  • Zinchenko, A., Kim, H., Danek, A., Müller, H. J., & Rangelov, D. (2015). Local feature suppression effect in face and non-face stimuli. Psychological Research, 79(2), 194–205.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Taylor, P. C. (2015). Occipital TMS at phosphene detection threshold captures attention automatically. Neuroimage, 109, 199–205.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Töllner, T. (2015). Efficiency of attentional selection is continuous rather than categorical. Conference Abstract: XII International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON-XII). Doi: 10.3389/Conf. Fnhum, 319.

  • Rangelov, D., Mueller, H., & Taylor, P. (2014). Occipital TMS at phosphene threshold captures attention. PERCEPTION, 43(1), 8–8.

  • Rangelov, D., & Zeki, S. (2014). Non-binding relationship between visual features. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 749.

  • Wykowska, A., & Rangelov, D. (2014). Review of: Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, ABradford Book, 2010. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(1–2), 209–215.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2013). Visual search for feature singletons: Multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 22–22.

  • Rangelov, D., Töllner, T., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2013). What are task-sets: a single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 524.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2013). Visual search for feature singletons: Multiple mechanisms.

  • Töllner, T., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2012). How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(28), E1990–E1999.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2012). The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis: Theory and empirical support. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(3), 540–552.

  • Zehetleitner, M., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 879–890.

  • Rangelov, D., Mueller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2012). Visual search for a feature-singleton: Not all display densities are made equal. PERCEPTION, 41, 139–139.

  • Tollner, T., Rangelov, D., & Muller, H. (2012). How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(8), 11086–11095.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: evidence for multiple weighting systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 100.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Independent dimension-weighting mechanisms for visual selection and stimulus identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1369.

  • Töllner, T., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Detecting, localizing, and identifying feature singletons in visual search: Does task set influence the speed of pre-attentive processing? Journal of Vision, 11(11), 1316–1316.

  • Rangelov, D., Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. (2011). Fractionating task-switch costs: a multi-component model of task switching. Conference Abstract: XI International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON XI). Doi: 10.3389/Conf. Fnhum, 303.

  • Müller, H. J., Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Geyer, T., Rangelov, D., & Krummenacher, J. (2010). Dimension-based attention modulates feed-forward visual processing. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 117–122.

  • Rangelov, D. (2010). Sequence effects in simple cognitive tasks: the multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis [Phdthesis].

  • Töllner, T., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. (2010). Detecting, localizing, and identifying feature singletons in visual search: post-selective, but not pre-attentive, processing differs as a function of task set.

  • Bruya, B. (2010). Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2009). Decomposition of dimension-specific intertrial effects: separate weighting systems modulate visual selection and identification processes. Perception, 38, 40–40.

  • Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2009). Independent dimension-weighting mechanisms for visual selection and identification. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.

  • Rangelov, D. (2004). Types of geometrical transformations and perceptual similarity of figures. Psihologija, 37(4), 483–493.

  • Rangelov, D., & others. (2004). Vrste geometrijskih transformacija i perceptivna sličnost oblika. Psihologija, 37(4), 483–493.

  • Bocca, F., Rangelov, D., & Zehetleitner, M. (n.d.). Time-course of attention and the dot-probe paradigm.

  • Rangelov, D. (n.d.). Reaction time methods II.

  • Uscătescu, L. C., & Rangelov, D. (n.d.). Early Attentional Capture in Visual Search is Subject to Both Task Set and Stimulus Conspicuity.

  • Stone, C., Mattingley, J. B., & Rangelov, D. (n.d.). Metacognitive training increases sensitivity to neural correlates of internal uncertainty during decision-making.